RESEARCH
HEALING OF MAGIC continues to collaborate on
several research projects around the world. If you or your Institution
would be interested in conducting a research project in a specific area
so that we can further document the therapeutic effectiveness of this
modality, please drop our office an email.
MAGIC AND MENTAL ILLNESS
MAGIC AND ACQUIRED BRAIN INJURY
MAGIC AND CHILD PSYCHOLOGY (LUDOTHERAPY)
MAGIC AND PSYCHOSOCIAL INTERVENTION
OTHER LINKS OF INTEREST
MAGIC AND MENTAL ILLNESS
Presented December 2007 by Phoebe Sui and Ming Sui
Baptist Oi Kwan Social Service – Wan Chai, Hong Kong
International Health and Mental Health Conference – Hong Kong
Use of Magic: Creative Means for Psychosocial Rehabilitation
Introduction
The therapeutic use of magic has been
applied in rehabilitation settings since 1982. With its influence and
the recognition gained for its “powerful” use of magic
therapy, the contemporary well-known magician and his partner, Mr.
Kevin Spencer and Mrs. Cindy Spencer dedicated themselves to develop a
program called “Healing of Magic”. A manual and DVD were
created to educate. The concepts and rationales of magic therapy were
then widely practiced in different rehabilitation settings. Numerous
people with physical or psychological disabilities have experienced the
benefits of performing magic tricks over the past 20 years.
Occupational therapy emphasizes on integrating
purposeful activities into treatments and therapeutic training for
people with disabilities, which minimize their dysfunction and improve
independence afterwards. Magic fits in perfectly with the principles of
OT treatments which motivate patients to actively involve in magic
trainings. American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA) recognizes
“the unique use of magic as a therapeutic method of occupational
therapy treatment…a therapeutic method which aids the patients
by enhancing their cognitive functions, perception, neuro-muscular and
motivational skills. Because of these concepts, we support the use of
magic as an authentic method of achieving therapeutic goals.”
Abstract
A two-year project called “Magic 4
Us” - Magic Therapy for people with Disabilities was launched in
2005 in BOKSS subsidized by the SK Yee Fund for the Disabled. By
incorporating magic into therapy sessions, the project aims to study
the changes among psychosocial and motor aspects of people with mental
illness after receiving magic therapy. It was assumed to improve
individuals’ motor and cognitive functioning, psychosocial and
motivation to engage in rehabilitation processes. As to be more
evidence based practice, “Magic 4 Us” is being integrated
into different rehabilitation units within BOKSS while it also
undergoes the research process in investigating the therapeutic use of
magic for people with mental illness.
Methodology
Professional Training
Prior to implementing magic therapy as one of
the treatment modality, 30 staffs including occupational therapists,
social workers and training staff were trained by Mr. Kevin Spencer
regarding the rationales and the applications of using magic in
rehabilitation services in December 2004.
Magic Therapy Training
Staffs who were interested in carry out magic therapy trainings in
their service units were trained by a local magician and occupational
therapists. Training sessions included introduction to different magic
tricks, the skills required in playing those tricks and the therapeutic
elements underneath. All trained staffs were responsible to carry magic
therapy trainings in their service units and the group members were
recruited to participate in the research study.
Inclusion Criteria
Participants were all diagnosed with mental illness majoring in
schizophrenia and depression. They were mentally stable and were
currently receiving our rehabilitation services within organization.
Assessment Tool
1. Purdue Pegboard was used to assess eye-hand coordination, bilateral hand function and fine motor dexterity.
2. Chinese General Self-Efficacy Scale was used to assess their perceived self-confidence.
3. Personal Well-being Index was used to assess their perceived happiness and satisfaction in general.
Data Collection
Interviews, focus group discussion and staff observation were utilized.
Results
Qualitative Outcomes
6 groups of participants with mental illness in
varies service settings (n = 40) were invited to participate in the
magic therapy research project. Data were then collected through 2
questionnaires, focus group interviews, oral or observational responses
during or after group sessions by researchers, trainers or magicians.
Results indicated highly positive impacts on both physical and
psychosocial aspects which demonstrate the significance of the
therapeutic use of magic as one of the new treatment alternatives for
people with mental illness.
Responses from the participants include: fun to
play with; easy to learn; it’s creative and innovative; feel
satisfy, competent and more confidence; can be concentrated; helping to
improve memory and general cognitive functioning; able to create more
conversation and be brave to talk aloud and better motor functioning.
Observational or informal conversation feedbacks
gathered from researchers, trainers or magicians include: improve fine
motor dexterity; more motivated, active and participate constantly in
group sessions; more presentable either in performance or communication
ability; increase self-confidence and self-esteem; express happiness
most of the time during group session.
Quantitative Outcomes
1. Personal Wellbeing Index
Data were analyzed by one-tailed paired-samples
t-test using SPSS (Table 1) for the general personal wellbeing with
t(27)=-1.873, p<0.05; the value obtained for the question regarding
interpersonal relationship was t(27)=-2.527, p<0.05; and the value
obtained for the question regarding integration into the society was
t(27)=-2.217, p<0.05. All results were significant indicating a
significant increase in the above items after training.
Table 1: Comparison on scores of the Personal Well-being Index before and after training
|
Items
|
Before
|
After
|
t
|
p-value
|
|
M
|
S.D
|
M
|
S.D
|
|
Overall Scores
|
34.36
|
12.254
|
38.86
|
12.039
|
-1.873
|
<0.05
|
|
(Q 5)Interpersonal Relationship
|
4.71
|
2.209
|
5.75
|
2.102
|
-2.527
|
<0.05
|
|
(Q 7)Integration into the Society
|
4.54
|
2.333
|
5.75
|
2.026
|
-2.217
|
<0.05
|
2. Purdue Pegboard
Data were analyzed by one-tailed paired-samples
t-test (Table 2) for the Purdue Pegboard. Among 4 items, 3 of them were
significant post assessments. In left hand, t(23)=-2.541, p<0.05. In
right hand, t(23)=-2.598, p<0.05. The results for both hands
assemble was t(23)=-4.454, p<0.01. All results were significant
indicating a significant increase after training.
Table 2: Comparison on scores of the Purdue Pegboard before and after training
|
Items
|
Before
|
After
|
t
|
p-value
|
|
M
|
S.D
|
M
|
S.D
|
|
Left hand
|
19.38
|
7.008
|
20.75
|
6.848
|
-2.541
|
<0.05
|
|
Right hand
|
18.54
|
6.079
|
19.42
|
6.351
|
-2.598
|
<0.05
|
|
Assemble
|
5.50
|
2.341
|
6.92
|
2.358
|
-4.454
|
<0.05
|
Results in the General Self-efficacy Scale,
significance was found in Question 8 (about the capability in
identifying multiple solutions to a problem) only with t(28)=1.864,
p<0.05, analyzed by one-tail paired-samples t-test, indicating an
increase after training.
Discussion
Watching magic shows is always an enjoyable and
pleasurable amusement while performing magic tricks; on the other hand,
it can also establish and receive enormous internal rewards.
The responses given by the participants and staff
highlighted the significant improvements on several aspects on
psychosocial, cognitive and motor functioning.
Regarding the psychosocial aspects, they were
favorably motivated to commit in group sessions with good attendance
compared with other psychosocial groups. Also, they experienced great
fun and happiness during the group sessions due to easy learning,
creativeness and innovation brought by playing magic tricks. Their
self-esteem / confidence or contents / topics of conversations were
therefore being enhanced.
Regarding the cognitive aspects, although they
were unable to indicate the areas of improvement precisely, the
majorities illustrated that their memory or concentration / attention
were greatly improved and were able to think “faster” and
more logical e.g. cause and effect.
Regarding the motor aspects, their motor
functioning, especially the fine motor dexterity, and eye-hand
co-ordination were improved remarkably as constant practice were
required.
On account of the above advantages, the majority
of the participants showed great interest in taking advanced training
group as moving towards the performance level, becoming a trainer or
performer in the Magic Therapy Committee organized by our organization.
Implication
Ongoing research should be carried out in
investigating and proving the long-term effects of using magic as
therapy for people with mental illness. Aiming to look forward to the
evidence-based practice in using magic as one of the treatment
modalities in enhancing one’s intrinsic motivation to participate
in treatment sessions, increase self-esteem or confidence, improve
social or communication skills, as well as to promote psychosocial
wellbeing. Moreover, further research on using magic as therapy for
different diversity of populations e.g. elderly is encouraged.
::BACK TO TOP::
MAGIC AND ACQUIRED BRAIN INJURY
DO YOU BELIEVE IN MAGIC?
TEACHING MAGIC TRICKS TO PATIENTS AS AN ADJUNCT TO THEIR REHABILITATION PROGRAM
Presented June 15, 2007 by Evan Kwong
Canadian Association of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
2007 Annual Scientific Meeting – Abstract submission
Evan H. Kwong MSc
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Nora Cullen MD, MSc, FRCPC
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Objective: To evaluate a pilot
program involving teaching magic tricks to Acquired Brain Injury (ABI)
patients undergoing rehabilitation at the Toronto Rehabilitation
Institute (TRI).
Method: From June 2006 to January
2007, simple magic tricks (from the Healing of Magic manual) were
taught to inpatients at the TRI Acquired Brain Injury unit. Over this
study period, a total of 11 inpatients were recruited to participate in
questionnaires and interviews before and after the intervention
(learning magic tricks). To evaluate effects on quality of life,
self-esteem, and mood, study participants were asked to complete the
EuroQol EQ-5D Health Questionnaire, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale,
and the Rand 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Instrument (SF-36). Study
participants were also interviewed to evaluate the program
qualitatively. 
Results: Of the 11 study
participants, 5 completed both the pre- and post-intervention
questionnaires while 9 completed both interviews. Study participants
learned magic tricks over 2-4 weeks. The mean EQ VAS health status
scores increased from 70.5±19 to 75±15, albeit
non-significantly (p=0.20). Changes in mean scores of the Rosenberg
Self-Esteem Scale were also non-significant (22.8±3.8 to
25.8±5.0, p=0.20). Of the eight SF-36 scales, only the
“Energy/Fatigue” scale significantly increased from
61±8 to 74±10 (p=0.02). The two scales related to mood
showed non-significant changes: “Role limitations due to
emotional problems” (60±37 to 87±30, p=0.09) and
“Emotional well-being” (81±11 to 89±5,
p=0.09). Two underlying themes for initial interest in the program were
“attending a fun and social activity” and “learning
magic to show others.” Three main themes identified from the
post-intervention interviews: “interesting activity”,
“challenging due to decreased function”, and
“increased self-esteem when successful.”
Conclusion: Incorporating a
program of teaching simple magic tricks to patients undergoing
rehabilitation may be an effective adjunct to their regular
rehabilitation program. The pilot program at TRI may be improved by
using the suggestions provided by the study participants and by
increasing the number of patients involved.

Click for larger photo
::BACK TO TOP::
MAGIC AND CHILD PSYCHOLOGY
EXPLORING LUDOTHERAPY AND MAGIC TRICKS
“Show me how you play; I’ll tell you how you feel.”
Project Coordinator: Dr. Mario Occhipinti, Center of Infant Psychology in collaboration
with University of Rome, Italy
Ludotherapy is a form of psychotherapy for children that uses play situations for diagnosis or treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the
effectiveness of teaching magic tricks to young patients as a method of
play therapy (ludotherapy) as a means of diffusing anxiety in pre and
post-operative treatments.
METHOD: In a separate study,
Italian researchers discovered that approximately 60% of all children
suffer from anxiety prior to minor surgery.
High levels of anxiety prior to surgery lead to higher risks of complications following surgeries in children.
In the study, researchers compared pre-surgery
anxiety levels in 40 children aged 5 to 12 who were about to have minor
surgery. Half of the children had a clown or magician along with a
parent while waiting for surgery and during the delivery of anesthesia.
The other half had only a parent and medical staff present.
The results shows that the children who had a
clown or magician present until they fell asleep experienced
significantly less pre-surgery anxiety and, consequently, required less
anesthesia.
(SOURCES: Vagnoli, L. Pediatrics, October 2005; vol 116: pp e563-e567. News release, American Academy of Pediatrics.)
Building on this study, psychologists, social
workers and volunteer magicians (in collaboration with IBM Ring 204 in
Rome) were integrated into pediatric units of several hospitals in
Italy to advance both psychological support and play therapy activities
with children preparing for treatment.
When possible, employees and volunteers met with
children at home prior to the hospital stay so that when the child
arrived at the unit, they saw a familiar face.
CONCLUSIONS: This has been an
ongoing program since December 2005. This therapy method, when
integrated with conventional medical treatment, provides psychological
support for young patients and their parents in pediatric units as it
enhances and reaffirms the basic concepts of Gelotogy – the
psychological and physiological study of laughter and its effects on
the human body.
::BACK TO TOP::
MAGIC AND PSYCHOSOCIAL INTERVENTION
MAGIC ARTS COUNSELING
The Tricks of Illusion as Intervention
David M. Levin, Therapist
Inner Harbour Hospital, GA
(edited for clarity by Kevin Spencer)
Introduction
“Magic arts” or “magic
therapy” counseling is defined as a nontraditional, experiential
curriculum utilized for promoting student growth. In an effort to
systematically explore its benefits, several educational factors and
key elements of magic arts counseling are defined. This study examined
the use of a six-week magic arts small group counseling module with
pre-adolescent boys. The study compared measures of self-esteem and
subsequent behavioral outcome measures for students receiving the magic
arts sessions described.
Setting
The setting is an intensive-level experiential
residential psychiatric hospital for severely emotionally disturbed
youth 6 to 18 years of age. Admission to the school program requires
the diagnosis of at least one Axis 1 diagnosis and each student is
prescribed psychotropic medication(s). The entire student population is
classified as special education.
Objective
To evaluate the potential benefits of learning
magic tricks for both academic and personal/social development in a
variety of classroom settings or programs.
Method
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE, Rosenberg,
1989) was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the “magic
therapy” program on participants.
Participants
Within the setting described, a population of six
pre-adolescent boys was utilized for this study. Diagnoses of students
comprised in the study included: Depressive Disorder Not Otherwise
Specified, Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD), Conduct Disorder,
Intermittent Explosive Disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity
Disorder (ADHD) or Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD), Bipolar Disorder,
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and Schizoaffective Disorder.
Common psychosocial stressors included a history of physical and/or
sexual abuse, poor family functioning and/or termination of parental
rights, legal issues, and substance abuse.
Procedure
The six students utilized were divided into two
groups of three and three respectively. Each group met six times; once
a week for one-hour sessions.
A pre-post test assessment was used to evaluate
the effectiveness of the program for participating students. Each group
took the RSE (Rosenberg, 1989) before and after the magic therapy small
group counseling module. The measure of self-esteem was chosen as a
construct that could be clearly measured and that would directly relate
to the key elements of empowering the child and self-esteem.
In addition to the RSE, student’s behavior
progress was tracked by direct care staff or classroom assistants using
direct observation recording. Staff documented behavioral observations
every 8 hours on student flow sheets. According to Inner Harbour
program policy, staff records a boundary violation after each time a
student has clear difficulty keeping limbs to themselves, engaging in
horseplay, or bringing up information about other students without
permission or in an inappropriate context.
These measures were chosen as two clear measurable
indicators of students’ behaviors in the school milieu. Student
totals for each behavioral indicator were collected at the beginning of
the first session and again at the end of the last session.
Results
The results of the RSE pre-test indicated a wide
range of responses among the six participating students. The RSE
post-test results indicated gains in self-esteem when compared to the
initial assessment. Students improved on eight (8) of the ten (10)
scale items. Behavior Tracking also indicated significant improvement.
ROSENBERG SELF-ESTEEM SCALE
Question 1 (I am satisfied with myself) produced a
change in mean response from 1.5 to 1.17, a .33 change in the direction
that indicated students were more satisfied with themselves after the
intervention.
Question 2 (At times I think I am no good at all)
produced a .5 decrease toward agreement with the negative statement
with a mean of 3.0 in pre-test and 2.5 at the end of the module. The
results of this statement may have been more positive but students may
have confused their responses to the statement by responding in
agreement versus disagreement with negative language.
Questions 3, 6, 8 and 10 (I feel I have a number
of good qualities; I certainly feel useless at times; I wish I could
have more respect for myself; and I take a positive attitude toward
myself) demonstrated gains consistent with improved self-esteem.
Question 4 (I am able to do things as well as most other people) seemed to demonstrate no difference in the aggregate mean.
Questions 5 and 7 (I feel I do not have much to be
proud of and I feel that I’m a person of worth) demonstrated
identical gains and positive changes.
Question 9 (All in all, I am inclined to think I
am a failure) demonstrated the largest improvement in measure of
self-esteem. The initial response of 2.83 increased to 3.5 upon
post-test, a mean change of .67 in the direction of increase
disagreement with the statement.
BEHAVIOR TRACKING
The tracking behavior progress measure indicated
significant positive gains on every measure. Behavior measures in
pre-intervention demonstrated 120 total boundary violations for the six
students, a mean of 20 violations per student. In addition,
students’ misbehaviors and safety required a total of 82
“time-outs,” a mean of 13.67 per student.
In post-intervention evaluations, only 42 total
boundary violations were recorded, with a mean of 7 per student. In
addition, only 31 “time outs” were recorded, with a mean of
5.17 per student. These totals indicate a 65% decrease in interpersonal
boundary violations and a 62% decrease in the requirement of staff
intervening with behavior disciplines.
Conclusions
The “magic arts” or “magic
therapy” counseling experience appears to successfully employ
several educational factors and promote key elements critical for
personal/social development and related student growth. Despite several
limitations of the research, the overall outcome of the investigation
suggests a clear benefit of using “magic arts” or
“magic therapy” with students in this population.
::BACK TO TOP::
RELATED LINKS
The UPliftment Programme
Inner Harbour Hospital
Magic Camp
LaBaccheta Magicia – Rome, Italy
Project Magic
Project Magic Austria
Project Magic Croatia
Project Magic Belgium
Healing of Magic in Belarus
Magic Therapy with Magic Andreu - Barcelona, Spain
Magic Therapy - Barcelona, Spain TV Story
SOME LINKS ON HEALING OF MAGIC
International Brotherhood of Magicians
CBS Saturday Early Show
REHAB TODAY
TD Monthly
FOX & FRIENDS
::BACK TO TOP::
|